New PODCAST 🎧 ep99 - What's the camera of the future? Trying out new features on CineD.com Listen or watch now!
LISTEN to PODCAST 🎧 ep99 🎬
What's the camera of the future?
Education for Filmmakers
Language
The CineD Channels
Info
New to CineD?
You are logged in as
We will send you notifications in your browser, every time a new article is published in this category.
You can change which notifications you are subscribed to in your notification settings.
We had the pleasure of talking to Tito Ferradans about his favorite topic: anamorphic lenses and how to use them on a shoot, even if you’re working on a budget.
Tito runs a channel on Youtube called “Anamorphic on a Budget” and that’s what this channel is all about: Getting the anamorphic look with cinematic blur, wide aspect ratios, and crazy lens flares and streaks, but on a budget. You don’t need (very) expensive offerings from companies like Cooke, ARRI, or Vantage. Use your existing glass, modify it a bit, or use some kind of anamorphic adapter with it.
If you want to know more about Tito’s work, you might want to check out his approach of modifying a Samyang 35mm T1.5 Cine lens to “anamorphic” (link) or how to cine mod a whole set of Contax still lenses (link). Another important topic is sensor size when it comes to anamorphic shooting. Read Tito’s opinion on this subject here.
In the video above, Tito explains that using “cheap” spherical lenses that produce a certain anamorphic look through modification or with the help of an adapter does not necessarily affect the quality of the resulting image. The main difference between a proper five-figure anamorphic cinema lens and cheaper consumer lenses modified for anamorphic shooting is not in the image quality itself, but in the handling, build quality and workflow efficiency on set.
If you’re lucky enough to be working on a big-budget production that’s being shot anamorphically, you’ll most likely be using a set of color-matched, high-quality anamorphic lenses. Focus and iris gears will be in the exact same position throughout the set, the front diameter will be the same for positioning a matte box, maybe the lenses will even have the same weight for seamless mounting on a gimbal or steadicam.
For lower-end shoots, a set of less expensive lenses modified to mimic anamorphic imagery is less ideal in terms of workflow, but the resulting images still look stunning.
Of course, a spherical lens will always be a spherical lens, even if it pretends to have an anamorphic look, but who cares, right? If it looks good, it looks good. It’s as simple as that.
I like Tito’s attitude of faking it until you make it. Just be resourceful, use the tools you have available (and your budget), and then let the creativity flow. Don’t focus too much on premium equipment, because in the end no one will notice if the final product looks good. Of course, using super expensive equipment can make things easier in terms of workflow, but you’ll obviously need a sufficient crew to handle it.
Link: Tito’s YouTube channel
What is your approach of shooting anamorphic? Share your experience in the comments below!
Δ
Stay current with regular CineD updates about news, reviews, how-to’s and more.
You can unsubscribe at any time via an unsubscribe link included in every newsletter. For further details, see our Privacy Policy
Want regular CineD updates about news, reviews, how-to’s and more?Sign up to our newsletter and we will give you just that.
You can unsubscribe at any time via an unsubscribe link included in every newsletter. The data provided and the newsletter opening statistics will be stored on a personal data basis until you unsubscribe. For further details, see our Privacy Policy
Olaf von Voss is a freelance cameraman who is in business for well over a decade. He is living in Berlin, Germany but has traveled the world as well while shooting mostly documentaries.