New PODCAST 🎧 ep99 - What's the camera of the future? Trying out new features on CineD.com Listen or watch now!
LISTEN to PODCAST 🎧 ep99 🎬
What's the camera of the future?
Education for Filmmakers
Language
The CineD Channels
Info
New to CineD?
You are logged in as
We will send you notifications in your browser, every time a new article is published in this category.
You can change which notifications you are subscribed to in your notification settings.
RED has recently filed a lawsuit against Nikon, accusing the Japanese company of infringing their infamous compressed RAW patent. According to the American company, the addition of internal RAW formats to the Nikon Z 9 deliberately emulates their compression technology.
A few weeks ago, we were pretty excited to report about the release of firmware V2.0 for the Nikon Z 9. Officially available for download since April 20th, the update adds the ability to internally record 12-bit N-RAW up to 8.3K60 and even ProRes RAW HQ up to 4.1K60. However, it looks like the party is (almost) over.
Indeed, RED has recently filed a lawsuit against the Japanese company for infringing their infamous compressed RAW patent. Its not clear whether the two companies will end up in court and/or Nikon will have to remove the long-awaited RAW formats from the Z 9. What’s certain is that the battle is now open.
History tends to repeat itself. In fact, it’s not the first time that RED takes legal action against competitors for infringing its own video compression patents. In recent times, Kinefinity was forced to remove CinemaDNG from their cameras. They also gave up on the development of their own KRW2.0 codec. Moreover, for the same reason ProRes RAW never made it to the DJI Ronin 4D, although this feature had been previously announced by the manufacturer.
The addition of internal N-RAW (which is based on intoPix’s TicoRAW) and ProRes RAW recording had been known since the initial release of the Nikon Z 9. Although the announcement was quite surprising, we initially thought the company had found a smart workaround to circumvent RED’s patent. Apparently, this brave attempt has failed.
Sure, business is business and the American company rightfully protects its own inventions. However, to me personally it looks like this constant long-term battle is not only limiting RED’s competitors, but it’s somehow slowing down the whole industry a little bit.
On the other hand, this situation forces companies to come up with ingenious solutions to overcome challenges imposed by intellectual property, just like Atomos and Blackmagic Design did with their ProRes RAW ecosystem and BRAW format respectively.
Featured image credit: photo by Tingey Injury Law Firm on Unsplash
Did you have the chance to shoot N-RAW or ProRes RAW on the Nikon Z 9? What do you think of RED’s approach in regard to their compressed RAW patent? Let us know your thoughts in the comment section below!
Δ
Stay current with regular CineD updates about news, reviews, how-to’s and more.
You can unsubscribe at any time via an unsubscribe link included in every newsletter. For further details, see our Privacy Policy
Want regular CineD updates about news, reviews, how-to’s and more?Sign up to our newsletter and we will give you just that.
You can unsubscribe at any time via an unsubscribe link included in every newsletter. The data provided and the newsletter opening statistics will be stored on a personal data basis until you unsubscribe. For further details, see our Privacy Policy
Francesco Andreola is a Milan-based filmmaker. He currently teaches the Video Technology class at the European Institute of Design (IED) in Milan. He works in the Camera Department as a camera operator and assistant.